Add an `is_mine_server_name` method, similar to `is_mine_id`.
Ideally we would use this consistently, instead of sometimes comparing
against `hs.hostname` and other times reaching into
`hs.config.server.server_name`.
Also fix a bug in the tests where `hs.hostname` would sometimes differ
from `hs.config.server.server_name`.
Signed-off-by: Sean Quah <seanq@matrix.org>
Previously, we would spin in a tight loop until
`update_state_for_partial_state_event` stopped raising
`FederationPullAttemptBackoffError`s. Replace the spinloop with a wait
until the backoff period has expired.
Signed-off-by: Sean Quah <seanq@matrix.org>
* Fix joining rooms you have been unbanned from
Since forever synapse did not allow you to join a room after you have
been unbanned from it over federation. This was not actually because of
the unban event not federating. Synapse simply used outdated state to
validate the join transition. This skips the validation if we are not in
the room and for that reason won't have the current room state.
Fixes#1563
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Werner <nicolas.werner@hotmail.de>
* Add changelog
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Werner <nicolas.werner@hotmail.de>
* Update changelog.d/15323.bugfix
---------
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Werner <nicolas.werner@hotmail.de>
Fixes#12801.
Complement tests are at
https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/pull/567.
Avoid blocking on full state when handling a subsequent join into a
partial state room.
Also always perform a remote join into partial state rooms, since we do
not know whether the joining user has been banned and want to avoid
leaking history to banned users.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Velten <mathieuv@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: Sean Quah <seanq@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: David Robertson <davidr@element.io>
1. `federation_client.timestamp_to_event(...)` now handles all `destination` looping and uses our generic `_try_destination_list(...)` helper.
2. Consistently handling `NotRetryingDestination` and `FederationDeniedError` across `get_pdu` , backfill, and the generic `_try_destination_list` which is used for many places we use this pattern.
3. `get_pdu(...)` now returns `PulledPduInfo` so we know which `destination` we ended up pulling the PDU from
While https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/13635 stops us from doing the slow thing after we've already done it once, this PR stops us from doing one of the slow things in the first place.
Related to
- https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13622
- https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/13635
- https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13676
Part of https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13356
Follow-up to https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/13815 which tracks event signature failures.
With this PR, we avoid the call to the costly `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event` because the signature failure will count as an attempt before and we filter events based on the backoff before calling `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event` now.
For example, this will save us 156s out of the 185s total that this `matrix.org` `/messages` request. If you want to see the full Jaeger trace of this, you can drag and drop this `trace.json` into your own Jaeger, https://gist.github.com/MadLittleMods/4b12d0d0afe88c2f65ffcc907306b761
To explain this exact scenario around `/messages` -> backfill, we call `/backfill` and first check the signatures of the 100 events. We see bad signature for `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` and `$zuOn2Rd2vsC7SUia3Hp3r6JSkSFKcc5j3QTTqW_0jDw` (both member events). Then we process the 98 events remaining that have valid signatures but one of the events references `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` as a `prev_event`. So we have to do the whole `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event` rigmarole which pulls in those same events which fail again because the signatures are still invalid.
- `backfill`
- `outgoing-federation-request` `/backfill`
- `_check_sigs_and_hash_and_fetch`
- `_check_sigs_and_hash_and_fetch_one` for each event received over backfill
- ❗ `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` fails with `Signature on retrieved event was invalid.`: `unable to verify signature for sender domain xxx: 401: Failed to find any key to satisfy: _FetchKeyRequest(...)`
- ❗ `$zuOn2Rd2vsC7SUia3Hp3r6JSkSFKcc5j3QTTqW_0jDw` fails with `Signature on retrieved event was invalid.`: `unable to verify signature for sender domain xxx: 401: Failed to find any key to satisfy: _FetchKeyRequest(...)`
- `_process_pulled_events`
- `_process_pulled_event` for each validated event
- ❗ Event `$Q0iMdqtz3IJYfZQU2Xk2WjB5NDF8Gg8cFSYYyKQgKJ0` references `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` as a `prev_event` which is missing so we try to get it
- `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event`
- `outgoing-federation-request` `/state_ids`
- ❗ `get_pdu` for `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` which fails the signature check again
- ❗ `get_pdu` for `$zuOn2Rd2vsC7SUia3Hp3r6JSkSFKcc5j3QTTqW_0jDw` which fails the signature check
Previously, `_resolve_state_at_missing_prevs` returned the resolved
state before an event and a partial state flag. These were unwieldy to
carry around would only ever be used to build an event context. Build
the event context directly instead.
Signed-off-by: Sean Quah <seanq@matrix.org>
Avoid blocking on full state in `_resolve_state_at_missing_prevs` and
return a new flag indicating whether the resolved state is partial.
Thread that flag around so that it makes it into the event context.
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
When a room has the partial state flag, we may not have an accurate
`m.room.member` event for event senders in the room's current state, and
so cannot perform soft fail checks correctly. Skip the soft fail check
entirely in this case.
As an alternative, we could block until we have full state, but that
would prevent us from receiving incoming events over federation, which
is undesirable.
Signed-off-by: Sean Quah <seanq@matrix.org>
There is a corner in `_check_event_auth` (long known as "the weird corner") where, if we get an event with auth_events which don't match those we were expecting, we attempt to resolve the diffence between our state and the remote's with a state resolution.
This isn't specced, and there's general agreement we shouldn't be doing it.
However, it turns out that the faster-joins code was relying on it, so we need to introduce something similar (but rather simpler) for that.
Patrick Cloke
Eric Eastwood
Sean Quah
Andrew Morgan
Alok Kumar Singh
DeepBlueV7.X
Mathieu Velten
Shay
Erik Johnston
reivilibre
David Robertson
Kateřina Churanová
Richard van der Hoff